Ending the Reign of Terry

Who fired high level CIA Doctor Terry Adirim? That's the question at the heart of her lawsuit against her former employer and the author. Here's a recap of the hearing held May 5, 2025.

Is Ivan driving important decisions at the Central Intelligence Agency?

Terry Adirim was the top doctor at the CIA and former DOD Health Official that signed the “Vaccine” Mandate that destroyed Hundreds of thousands of Servicemembers and family members. She claims Laura Loomer caused Terry’s ouster during Loomer’s white house meeting on April 2nd, due to inflammatory X posts made by me. They got the chain of events completely wrong as explained deftly by the CIA’s talented counsel.

There was a hearing yesterday at the Alexandria Federal Courthouse about the temporary administrative stay on the termination of Terry Adirim. It was very entertaining, with lots of tea spillage, I went to watch the proceedings and take notes. This hearing did not require my presence for it was to consider whether the judge will require an “administrative stay” to stop Adirim from being terminated from her position at the CIA pending the outcome of the lawsuit. Terry Adirim—who spearheaded the, What Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth calls the Unlawful DOD “Vaccine” mandate that forced thousands of critical thinkers out of the military and injured others who took the jab—has a retirement vesting date next month, so an administrative stay would benefit her greatly. We will go through the transcript carefully when it’s available. Meanwhile, here is a summary of the highlights.

The Court opened with asking both sides about scheduling a hearing to discuss the TRO, unless CIA’s counsel was ready to provide an oral argument. Which they were!!!

First, Attorney Rudkowski, representing John Ratcliffe, the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency and the Agency made a statement. She was extremely professional and did a great job of pulling together a response to this lawsuit that was filed after hours on Friday, by Monday at 10 am. She absolutely knocked it out the park, giving well researched substantive answers about why plaintiff Terry Adirim is not likely to succeed in her lawsuit against the CIA nor Ivan Raiklin. She made the following points :

1. Adirim was a contract employee and there is a clause stating that either party can terminate the 5 year contract “for any reason” and it doesn’t necessarily have to be a good reason, so she doesn’t have the sort of protections that other civil servants would have. The judge asked about the 5^th amendment due process clause and if that applies, she stated that the plaintiff did not even claim to have been fired because of Plaintiff’s membership in a constitutionally protected class, the 5^th amendment would not apply.

2. There had been an employment review that started several weeks before April 4^th 2025. Since Adirim was brought into a critical leadership role at the CIA during the Biden administration CIA leadership had to make sure she was still a good fit under the President Trump 2.0 Administration. There had been several coworker complaints against Adirim’s conduct by CIA employees that contributed to the decision of her firing. This had not previously been publicly announced, but since this suit has been brought, the agency must make that information available to the court.

3. Attorney Rudkowski pointed out that Loomer took credit for several firings after the April 2^nd meeting, but never mentioned Adirim. Why would she omit this if she could also take credit for this firing? Adirim claims that Laura Loomer asked President Trump to fire her during the meeting at the White House on April 2^nd but there is no evidence this is the case.

Adirim’s attorney Kevin Carroll then made his statement. Here is a recap of his main points presented along with the two times he perjured himself before the court.